skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Williams, R_Ryan"

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. Abstract We continue the program of proving circuit lower bounds via circuit satisfiability algorithms. So far, this program has yielded several concrete results, proving that functions in$$\mathsf {Quasi}\text {-}\mathsf {NP} = \mathsf {NTIME}[n^{(\log n)^{O(1)}}]$$ Quasi - NP = NTIME [ n ( log n ) O ( 1 ) ] and other complexity classes do not have small circuits (in the worst case and/or on average) from various circuit classes$$\mathcal { C}$$ C , by showing that$$\mathcal { C}$$ C admits non-trivial satisfiability and/or#SAT algorithms which beat exhaustive search by a minor amount. In this paper, we present a new strong lower bound consequence of having a non-trivial#SAT algorithm for a circuit class$${\mathcal C}$$ C . Say that a symmetric Boolean functionf(x1,…,xn) issparseif it outputs 1 onO(1) values of$${\sum }_{i} x_{i}$$ i x i . We show that for every sparsef, and for all “typical”$$\mathcal { C}$$ C , faster#SAT algorithms for$$\mathcal { C}$$ C circuits imply lower bounds against the circuit class$$f \circ \mathcal { C}$$ f C , which may bestrongerthan$$\mathcal { C}$$ C itself. In particular:#SAT algorithms fornk-size$$\mathcal { C}$$ C -circuits running in 2n/nktime (for allk) implyNEXPdoes not have$$(f \circ \mathcal { C})$$ ( f C ) -circuits of polynomial size.#SAT algorithms for$$2^{n^{{\varepsilon }}}$$ 2 n ε -size$$\mathcal { C}$$ C -circuits running in$$2^{n-n^{{\varepsilon }}}$$ 2 n n ε time (for someε> 0) implyQuasi-NPdoes not have$$(f \circ \mathcal { C})$$ ( f C ) -circuits of polynomial size. Applying#SAT algorithms from the literature, one immediate corollary of our results is thatQuasi-NPdoes not haveEMAJ∘ACC0∘THRcircuits of polynomial size, whereEMAJis the “exact majority” function, improving previous lower bounds againstACC0[Williams JACM’14] andACC0∘THR[Williams STOC’14], [Murray-Williams STOC’18]. This is the first nontrivial lower bound against such a circuit class. 
    more » « less